Home   Montana Resources   Health Links   Internet Reference 
  Log InSign Up AboutHelp   
Some may think you're crazy if your business isn't here...


Forum Topic Messages
Forum:Montana Life 
Topic:
Flashback!!
This topic has been viewed 9648 times
 
Author: Nimue    ( 2505 posts )Posted: Sat, Oct 06  11:21 AM

Agreed Mojo. Maybe thimke can come up with some proof of his allegations.

Author: Thimk    ( 6969 posts )Posted: Sat, Oct 06  2:34 PM

____________________

I was referring to "the leftists" on this forum. Sorry for the confusion, par.

Apparently "will use" is the same as "already done" in Thump's mind.

Myself, I've never heard even one of the "leftists" who used to be here say "I want the US to lose" or anything even close.

____________________
You're correct. They have never used the phrase and they have not been polled anonymously, eitther. But the arguments they have used are the same used by the radical left in vile condemnation of the US. These are the same radical leftists who believe it would be in _________'s best interest for the US to lose.


Author: Nimue    ( 2505 posts )Posted: Sat, Oct 06  11:39 PM

Some of the arguements you use Thimke are the same ones used by white surpremists. By the logic you are using above does that make you a white supremist then?

Author: Bob_kiefer    ( 3781 posts )Posted: Sun, Oct 07  7:58 AM

Nimue, you are making quite a stretch there. Why don't you show us some white supremacist literature or propaganda that is similar to Thimk's statements. I call B.S. on that. The light is shining and the leftists are trying to hide because deep down they know that in order for them to grab power, it would be better for the US to lose. What kind of thinking would you classify that as? Retarded? ....well, if it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck........

Author: Thimk    ( 6969 posts )Posted: Sun, Oct 07  7:59 AM

____________________

Some of the arguements you use Thimke are the same ones used by white surpremists. By the logic you are using above does that make you a white supremist then?
____________________
Your logic would work if my entire sentence was not used. "But the arguments they have used are the same used by the radical left in vile condemnation of the US." None of my arguments have ever villified another race OR even hinted that any one race was superior to another.


Author: Bob_kiefer    ( 3781 posts )Posted: Sun, Oct 07  8:10 AM

The problem is, Thimk, you are hitting too close to home. Just think if even a slightly leaning left individual admitted outright that they were in favor of the US losing the war. Their world would become unraveled! They will have to at least wait until after the next election.

*snicker*


Author: Nimue    ( 2505 posts )Posted: Sun, Oct 07  11:27 AM

I'm not in favor of the U.S. losing the war. I'd just like to know what winning it will look like.

Author: Queequeg    ( 1257 posts )Posted: Sun, Oct 07  2:34 PM

I'm not in favor of the U.S. losing the war. I'd just like to know what winning it will look like.
____________________

Easy. The jihadis quit, surrender their weaponry, and go home.


Author: Thimk    ( 6969 posts )Posted: Sun, Oct 07  2:43 PM

____________________

I'm not in favor of the U.S. losing the war. I'd just like to know what winning it will look like.
____________________

Easy. The jihadis quit, surrender their weaponry, and go home.

____________________
Besides, it is irrelevant to the poll. Another point is another 20% aren't sure. That's 40% of Democrats who either believe or aren't sure if the world would be better off if the were sent packing. The left suffers terribly from moral confusion. No wonder liberalism is called a mental disease.


Author: Nimue    ( 2505 posts )Posted: Sun, Oct 07  3:22 PM

____________________

I'm not in favor of the U.S. losing the war. I'd just like to know what winning it will look like.
____________________

Easy. The jihadis quit, surrender their weaponry, and go home.

____________________

If that's the case then it's just as I thought, there is no winning.



  Displaying records 11 - 20 out of 33
    1-10    11-20    21-30    31-33